cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/31683994

Fox News reports that Donald Trump may consider using nuclear weapons to eliminate Iran’s Fordo nuclear facility

The U.S. military has reservations regarding the success of using a bunker-buster bomb, a non nuclear weapon, to eliminate Iran’s Fordo nuclear facility, buried deep in a mountain. Two defense officials were reportedly briefed that only a tactical nuclear weapon could reach the facility.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Art of the Deal”. Always start “negotiations” with a threat to go nuclear, then brag and posture and bully. Deal

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    He is going to back pedal because Iran is his boss’s (Putin ) ally. He is once again talking shit he has no intention of backing up. I could see him ordering a nin-nuke strike on something that wouldn’t get him in trouble with his handler though as a fake tough man move.

    • thru_dangers_untold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      He floats the craziest idea so that whatever happens he can say “at least I didn’t do that one thing” and his base will praise him for it–even though the thing he actually did was still moronic. This is the “permanent 300% tariff”, “Canada will be the 51st state”, or the “Golden Trump Gaza” video. It’s the only way this imbecile knows how to negotiate.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The Golden Trump Gaza, what a fucking joke. I could be totally wrong but I’m going to take a guess and say that the Gaza strip is one of the most bombed out places in the world. If true it’ll be littered with unexploded ordinance forever or at least practically forever. He wants to make a giant Mar’a Lago? Sure okay, I’m sure your guests would enjoy the risk of losing a limb or being killed cause a forgotten bomb goes off 10 years later.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      He’s gonna backpadel because he is a wimp, a paper tiger, he doesn’t dare to send people to war as he’s chickened out of Viet Nam.

      TACO

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    What is a country? A miserable pile of war crimes.

    Turning a habitable area full of innocent people into a pile of radioactive rubble and dying people why? Because fucking the Israeli government wants to genocide palestinians without resistance? Damn we fucking suck as a country

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Trump will drop a nuke before leaving office. He been begging to use one since his first term. They literally had to stop him from nucking a hurricane. He wants to do it. My worry is he will drop one on an American state.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Same guy that kept ripping on Zelensky for “instigating” nuclear war

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Something tells me he has already given the order multiple times but the people around him have to carefully explain to him why that’s a very bad idea until he backs down.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Just please wait until after I’ve seen Dune Messiah a couple dozen times in theaters. Please. That’s all I’m asking. I don’t even need to get laid again, that ship isnt even that important and it happens to a lot of people every day. I just want to see Dune Messiah before we all die.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If this were to happen, it would be a green light for Putin.

    Let’s hope to all fuck that our idiotic congress or who the fuck ever, prevents this abject, fucking, idiocy.

    • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I thought I could write solid, dark comments but your comment about having our only hopes based solely on congress wins all the awards for darkest comment ever written.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Congress isn’t stopping him doing anything. I don’t see them suddenly changing just to prevent global nuclear war.

    • opavader@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      excluding few hard left or right leaders, our entire congress works for aipac so fat chance of that. they will approve nuking LA and SF if israel told them to.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Jesus was a Palestinian Jew, if Trump met Him today he would send Him to CECOT.

      • Tujio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Talked about sharing and didn’t like rich folks. This admin ordnance a huge fan of brown socialists.

  • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    18 hours ago

    What a great precedent that would set. Seems like humans are moving towards ending all life on earth. Just another dead rock in an infinite vacuum.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Not to say that nuclear war isn’t bad, but we literally don’t have enough bombs available to do that.

      • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I just very much believe that a chain reaction after a nuclear war will kill everything alive on it. Almost certainly all humans would be gone pretty soon.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You can believe it all you want, the numbers just aren’t there. There are only ~3800 nuclear warheads that are ready for launch, across all countries that possess them. That’s not enough to put a permanent dent in the human population even if you launched all of them targeted to inflict maximum casualties. Which isn’t how they’d be launched, of course - most of them would be aimed at military targets, such as ICBM silos and airstrips that are out in the middle of nowhere.

          I expect you’ll propose nuclear winter as the actual killing effect. Nuclear winter has been drastically overblown, often for this very reason - to scare people into an anti-proliferation stance. We know a lot more now than we did when the first wild predictions were made.

          Again, not to say that nuclear war isn’t bad. But if one is to make good decisions one should strive for realistic understanding of the world. It wouldn’t literally cause human extinction.

          • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            offf. Ok. Thanks for all the perfectly factual and proven references, or ahhh…on-going debates, you gave.
            Does any of it consider the wars that will be triggered? How the water supply will be affected? How the weather is going to be affected after an already fucked up atmosphere absorbs this damage? I could go on but this is pointless with a person like you.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Does any of it consider the wars that will be triggered? How the water supply will be affected? How the weather is going to be affected after an already fucked up atmosphere absorbs this damage?

              Did you consider any of it? In an actually analytical way, that is, instead of just imagining the outcome you wanted?

              I provided links, you provided nothing but belief and fearmongering. And downvotes, of course, which also prove nothing.

              • seralth@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Nukes get dropped, war will break out. This will result in large chunks of the world being killed.

                Humanity will not be the same after.

                It wasn’t the last two fucking times we did it, and there’s only more people now to get even more fucked up and have an even more extreme reaction to such instability.

                • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  None of which comes close to rendering humanity extinct. That’s been my point all along. Nuclear war would suck, but it would not render humanity extinct.

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ah yes, very smart, let’s use a nuke to blow up a nuclear facility. There couldn’t possibly be a much larger explosion and spread of radiation because of that.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Well, there actually wouldn’t be a much larger explosion, that’s just not how nukes work.
      A nuclear explosion is an incredibly delicate process, and the material just won’t go critical because there’s another detonation nearby. It’s not like dropping a bomb on a dynamite warehouse. There’s not a great analogy for what it is like though. Expecting a satellite launch to happen because you blew up a tank of rocket fuel next to it? Not quite there.

      Additional contamination from onsite material is a different matter. Most nukes detonate above their target since that maximizes damage, but it also reduces fallout. There would, however, be vaporized material that would be sucked into the air by the vacuum created by the detonation. It’s not clear if the presence of radioactive material would make it significantly worse than the general “radioactive dust and molten sand” that would normally be sent into the air.

      In general, if you nuke something there’s going to be radioactive issues afterwards, and you shouldn’t do it. Adding a nuclear facility to the mix is kinda just throwing rocks at the windows on 9/11.

      • opavader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        tons of enriched uranium becoming part of the fallout plume and spreading across middle east and possibly some parts of europe and asia is a very likely outcome.

        netayanahu is scum enough to not care and trump is too stupid to care. then there is possibilities of pakistan launching nuke in return on israel and then idf activating samson.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Explosion no. Extra fallout, maybe. But the facility we’re talking about is deep underground, so even if it happens, hopefully that contains some of the fallout.

      • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Unfortunately, ground burst or partial underground bursts are significantly dirtier than air bursts. You only get partial completion of the reaction on the parts closer to the ground or underground which further irradiates the debris that is kicked up. Its all kinds of bad news.