Summary

The Pentagon announced a new annual media rotation program, removing established outlets like NBC News, The New York Times, NPR, and Politico from dedicated workspaces.

The memo orders these organizations to vacate their offices in two weeks, while replacing them with outlets such as OANN, New York Post, Breitbart, and HuffPost.

NBC News expressed disappointment over losing long-held technical capabilities essential for timely reporting.

The move follows Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s narrow confirmation and signals a broader effort to reshape Pentagon media access, transforming U.S. government communications permanently.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Not a great move, but maybe a spark might go off in some of these orgs and they will stop worrying about putting facts behind “access” to these assholes.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    The new outlets rotating in are One America News Network — which will take NBC News’s spot — the New York Post, Breitbart News Network and HuffPost.

    This is obviously 100% political. And the way of the new administration. They are excluding any opposition however moderate, everywhere they can, and then replace them with political supporters.

    Welcome to the new authoritarian antidemocratic America!

    • errer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I know you didn’t highlight it but HuffPost is just as bad as the others nowadays…maybe even worse because it tries to hide behind supposed “balanced” coverage

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Remember this post everyone. This user is 100% correct. If we dont act soon there will be no more acting.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Thank you for relating your personal experiences. I feel like a lot of people don’t really have a good sense for how the authoritarian playbook works in the modern day.

          If anyone wants a more professional analysis, Ruth Ben-Ghiat is a historian with a background in Italian fascism, and specializes in modern authoritarianism.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let me guess: they’re going to “rotate” in actual propaganda like NewsMax and OAN…

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      This rotation appears to be OAN, New York Post, Breitart, and Huff Post. So, three conservative organizations plus Huff Post.

      Huff Post is an organization that has no credibility on the right and no experience covering the Pentagon. They’re removing the outlets that might actually be able to make a difference while still giving themselves the cover of “Well, we added Huff Post!”

      I’m waiting to see them start banning NBC, ABC, etc from Whitehouse press events.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        huffpost is currently owned by buzzfeed. buzzfeed, afaik, has not kissed the diaper (yet). buzzfeed shuttered their news division, which was actually ‘ok’ (and different than the click-chasing junk on buzzfeed itself), after they acquired huffpost. huffpost is their news site now. the wildcard here is that comcast is a major shareholder (around one-third, iirc) of buzzfeed.

        huffpost’s inclusion could go either way:

        they (comcast) flex their muscles and ‘encourage’ buzzfeed to keep their left-leaning site quiet and ‘under control’

        they take offense at nbc getting kicked out and use nbc and nbcnews (which are not included in the planned spin-off of cable properties that includes cnbc and msnbc) to help huffpost report the real news and get it on the air.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Also, half the population that voted wants this to happen. They are on board because they watch and listen to those propaganda outlets and think the mainstream news isn’t telling the truth*. They want their propaganda.

        *mainstream news does omit a lot of stuff and absolutely has an agenda to further their capitalist objectives by promoting stuff that gets reactions and trying to both sides everything. But they still try to make sure what they do report is accurate.

          • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s all people who are eligible to vote. The infographic is on par with a normal election. There’s always a majority of the nation that does not vote. Many of them are lower class people who can’t afford to take a day off to vote.

            • richieadler 🇦🇷@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I’d bet the percentages are the same all over the world where the right has won and is doing similar atrocities.

              In Argentina the vote is mandatory and you only need to be a citizen and have a valid national ID to vote (and we vote on Sundays). The percentage of non-voters is around 20-30% every election.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because people are still telling us this is better than violence. We also don’t have organization. “Lone wolf” attacks will not work and just justify further erosion. We need a pack but no one knows how to form one.

      • WHARRGARBL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        So what does 21st century resistance look like? It seems that the bystander effect Germany experienced 100 years ago is happening in the USA now. What would have prevented the rise of the Third Reich? Protests are ineffectual, and I have no idea how to organize or resist - I’m just trying to stay informed in a horrified and helpless kind of way, which accomplishes nothing more than my passive complicity.

        Do we need a modern Black Panthers movement? If a brilliant and charismatic leader like Malcolm X were to come forward and lead us, would we be inadvertently accelerating the inevitable martial law or creating the excuse for Civil War II Red vs Blue? Is it even feasible to envision an effective plan from a demographic that prefers pacifism?

        • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Whatever action is made peaceful or not will be used to accelerate martial law. What happens following will not be entirely peaceable but the degree of fighting is unknown.

          The alternative is holocaust II so…

          • Carrolade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            A general strike (which is a peaceful method) beats martial law, not the other way around. Not easy to organize by any stretch, but historically effective.

            • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              No general strike has ever been allowed nonviolently. How do we organize a general strike when 32% support the shit, 36% don’t care, and the other 31% are trying not to be the ones that get shuffled off to camps first? I’m not trying to be defeatist I’m genuinely asking.

              • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Other people being violent towards you does not make your actions violent. Also, there’s actually been many general strikes that were not attacked by state forces at least. There have probably been hundreds of general strikes through history. They’re common enough that they’re not really covered in history classes past a sentence or two, if at all. It was actually a general strike that staved off the first coup against the German civilian govt post-WW1.

                Organizing, I’m not sure.

      • richieadler 🇦🇷@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        “Lone wolf” attacks will not work

        And also won’t happen. In the US all the “patriots” who have guns to “fight the tyranny” actually want their guns to kill the dark skinned people they don’t like.

  • slickgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    My take is that we have entered the apex of the MAGA phase.

    Now that the incompetents have achieved power, they will start to destroy themselves through stupidity.

    Don’t get me wrong, a lot of damage will be visited upon the heads of the innocent. But it is going to take this destruction to demonstrate just what a terrible idea it was to install these dickheads in the first place.

    After all, the voters were warned, and also got a taste of chaos in the first series. They still voted him in.

    Ok, let Trump set the electorate’s hair on fire and see what happens next.

    • Railing5132@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Apathy. Apathy is what happens next.

      “I have bills to pay, I’m not taking time off to protest”

      “I’m not the one being deported, sure, I feel bad but it’s not like one voice will make a difference”

      Etc…