Here’s the technology connections test/analysis from 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0YW7x9U5TQ

The claim is we need more comprehensive regulation for brake/slow down lights.

To add on, the video is about self hosting, it was not self hosted itself.

Nice!

This is actually insane. Their brakes must wear out so fast.

I don’t think they illuminate the brake lights, hence my comment. Technology connections has talked about this, although IDK which video it was.

Now that’s taking things too far.

But the slow down thing can actually catch drivers by surprise, especially with electric vehicles.

I think they should have it so there’s a type of “slow down” light that supplements the brake light for when your deceleration is from taking your foot off the gas.

Yeah I’d like to see how he designs the 3d models

Whoa this was pretty cool.

This better be electroboom

Weird I wonder if this is happening on Android too.

It still might be problematic around airports if people on the ground breathe it in before it reacts. And what about all the sodium bicarbonate precipitating all over the ground? That’s bound to affect the local environment before it ends up in the oceans…

That said who knows maybe it’s better than the carbon dioxide alternative

I still like Ubuntu, as long as everything works, I recommend getting the LTS release.

The models seem to be getting worse at this one task?

Unfortunately, you are incorrect, and everything WhyJiffie has said about trusted computing on Android hardware is correct, and there is currently nothing to stop it from happening on PCs too, when TPM is more ubiquitous.

This is the same technology that locks printers out of 3rd party ink, or restricts the ability of farmers to repair their own tractors.

I recommend learning more about it, and reading what Cory Doctorow writes about it. https://pluralistic.net/2024/01/18/descartes-delenda-est/#self-destruct-sequence-initiated

What happens? I don’t mind spoilers

Can Waymo sometimes use a remote human driver?

The problem is if it’s wrong, you have no way to know without double checking everything it says

We can’t claim that everything weird is written by AI, because there are weird human writers too. Although even if not AI, “experts claim” is such a dodgy source, that alone makes it untrustworthy.

The laws of physics are best understood at standard temperatures and pressures, where we have loads of data. To understand how physics works in more extreme circumstances, we have to create those circumstances and then measure what happens. At CERN, they accelerate particles very fast, smash them together, and record and analyze what happened. This is how they observed the Higgs boson and measured its properties.

From the article, it looks like one of the experiments is to shoot the laser into an oncoming high speed beam of electrons. One of the things they’re looking for is if this high amount of energy causes matter and anti matter pairs to spontaneously form and annihilate. Our theories predict this but the more ways we can measure it the more we can learn, for instance about what happened right after the big bang, and why we were left with matter instead of everything annihilating symmetrically.