they will save 188,000 € on Microsoft license fees per year

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I can’t see a reason why Linux distro wouldn’t be enough for 99% of office machines. Unless deployment is really that much better and easier with Windows and MS Office. And whatever proprietary apps they use that need running on certain OS.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      5 days ago

      Those proprietary apps are the really big factor. A lot of stuff is run from a browser these days, but some systems are just too expensive to replace.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Things are slowly starting to get better in a lot of the fields I interface with.

        Payroll and accounting software? Many great browser-based offerings. Unfortunately that also means the backend is running in the developer’s servers, but these applications were generally proprietary to begin with.

        EMR company I’ve done a lot of work with (used to be an engineer there), has essentially halted progress on their Windows-only native client (and it was DEEPLY entrenched in Windows) and is now browser based, retaining 99% of functionality. This one always connected to a proprietary backend anyway.

        Own a VW, Audi, Seat, Škoda, Bentley or Lamborghini (depending on model year for some of those)? The popular 3rd party diagnostic software for those, called VCDS, now has a mobile variant if you buy the wireless dongle instead of the cable - it runs a server in the dongle itself that you connect to via wifi, and it displays the sofware as a website. Of course it’s available for non-mobile browsers too.

        Common theme among all of these is that none need to do heavy data processing on the client - though nowadays that is also solvable using WASM.

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I mean, at my work we mostly have operating apps that just run inside browser anyway. Our mail clients also run in browser. Only some internal apps are something specially that feels like JAVA designed or something that should run on Linux as well. We could easily use some Linux distro and with KDE or Cinnamon/MATE/XFCE it would be roughly similar to Windows 11. Most people have no clue what version we have, they just know it’s Windows. You could just tell them it’s special new version of Windows for companies and they’d just eventually adapt to it not knowing it’s not really Windows at all.

    • exu@feditown.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 days ago

      The advantage Windows has is Intune for device management.
      The disadvantage is having to use Intune.

      Linux is just much easier to script an install an manage using any of the IaC tools you might already be using for your servers. Yes, you can manage Windows with the same tools but it just isn’t as reliable in my experience.

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        The best thing about R is that it was made by statisticians. The worst thing about R is that it was made by statisticians.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is my biggest thing. How come nobody really has any MDM or MEM for Linux? One that actually offers everything that Intune does.

        Hell i even use AD (Yes Microsoft Active Directory) on my Linux servers because it actually works

        • Ironfist79@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          There are several CM tools already available. Chef, Puppet, Ansible, Salt, etc. Just pick one.

          • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’ve tried all of them but none of them are quite as fully featured as the M365 platform. That’s really where they get you. It offers MDM, MEM, email, account control, file shares, antivirus, patch scanning, group policy, and countless other things all under one platform.

            None of those are really a whole ecosystem.

    • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Windows + office + account and identity management all come with Ms 365 business in the first tier past family. For about $15 or $16 a month you can use InTune to set up logins and select enrollment with MFA as well a provision computers and management with InTune including Boyd self enrollment for laptops, Android, and Apple. All your files get rbac, backup, and recovery from day 1. You can, and I would recommend strongly against this, even manage your osx devices from InTune.

      It’s very slick and there is a reason business use it. This thread is somewhat delusional on how easy it is to manage and how terrible office 365 is.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        UntilI can log a user on and have all their stuff automatically sync or download on Linux. Microsoft can have office computers. But please, please let Linux take over gaming.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not.

      The problem is that one percent that does need Windows.

      Unicorns suck in IT. It’s a small number of systems that take a disproportionate amount of admin overhead.

      So IT leadership has to decide if they support a separate OS for a small percentage of users, or one OS that works for everyone (Windows).

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Those boxes will be unicorns no matter what, though, also, they’re not necessarily part of the general IT infrastructure. Someone in catastrophe defence might be running fluid simulations using some god awful expensive windows-only software but chances are they can manage their own box, and if not, the ministry will still have IT staff who can deal with that kind of thing.

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          IT absolutely does still have to manage those things though. At my company we have all sorts of obscure boxes controlling things like diagnostic readers and CNC machines. Things that the mechanics/engineers [imo] should be able to manage, its still on us.

          Plus they usually still want those things to access the internet (because they require it) or access to file shares (to get gcode files and whatever) which is firmly an IT task

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mean… my condolences and/or yay you get to be a honorary machinist?

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Unless deployment is really that much better and easier

      In staging, i made a batch script to run the shortcuts on desktop we had to run to check if setup was successful. But i couldn’t just run the command of the shortcut but had to run the shortcut itself, because that made a difference.

      In short: no.