the summary (not ecessarily ai generated) I read elsewhere is what got me to wikipedia in the first place.

it also would have very publically been a huge failure. Tesla tended to ignore the science when he didn’t like it. It could not have possibly worked

if only they made the thumbnails just a little bit bigger. My monitor still fits 9 of them, tsk tsk

i have oil in the differential that needs occasional replacement

a plane. A flying car is called a plane.

marked as duplicate, see <other question from 2005, before LLMs were invented>

also, you can make computers much more cheap and reliable, more maintainable and much much faster, if you protect them from space radiation by operating them down here, under the protection of earth’s atmosphere.

very stupid. One of the most difficult things in space is cooling stuff. Sending up a bunch of space heaters in a box (almost all of the energy pumped into a computer is turned into heat. The actual computatiion takes next to nothing in comparison) is definitely not a good idea. Definitely not one thought up by a technical person.

there’s lots of handwavy things. They even said they “discovered new physics” to explain some disappointing (perfectly predictable, by other established nuclear physicists) results. “Oh the physics equation was wrong, we just need to make everything 25% bigger”.

Also, the emitted radiation levels will be insane once it’s scaled up

the ones that give up on all the “desirable” aspects of cryptocurrencies? The payment isn’t final until it is on chain. You don’t need to trust anyone to figure out if you’re on the right chain in the first place. Off-chain shit defeats this. What’s the point, other than dressing up the horse before beating it some more?

for example? Because your statement is similar to asking a chef what’s on the menu and them replying with “food”

not with LLMs, definitely

when you flood the internet with content you don’t want, but can’t detect, that is quite difficult

except that they regularly do. It isn’t even news at this point

but that’s not what they’re doing when they’re spitting out open source code verbatim, with no attribution or license

well yeah. And it has been proven time and again that they can, and do, regurgitate that training material out quite often

if i learn a book by heart, and then go around making money by reciting it, then that’s illegal. same thing.

The biggest frustration is not me changing settings.

The biggest frustration is windows changing back those settings whenever it feels like it.

This is just doubling down on the “greatest frustration”

yes, not from apple though. That’s a guarantee they would be useless for a tinkerer

only until they find out most people never enable it. Then it will be forced on