• 0 Posts
  • 64 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle
  • Whatever anyone China-affiliated says they’re not doing, it’s a safe bet that’s exactly what they’re doing.

    I’m not going to push any conspiracy theories, but I believe the strongest evidence pointing towards Covid-19 originating in a lab is the Chinese government insisting that it didn’t, while prohibiting anyone not under their control from investigating. That doesn’t mean it did originate from a lab, but if anything, that’s what it points to. To be explicit: My impression is that, currently, most available evidence points towards natural origins. However the Chinese government has done its best to convince me otherwise.



  • To be fair, this was originally the point of plastic. The primary point of plastic today is that it is an extremely cheap material that you can mould into pretty much any shape.

    Need a bag to carry stuff? Plastic.

    Packaging for toothpicks? Plastic.

    Spacers inside an electric circuit? Plastic.

    Packaging for clothes? Plastic.

    Fake plant? Plastic.

    Part of the problem is that we’re using a wonder-material that lasts forever (plastic) for a bunch of mundane shit where we don’t need it, because that wonder-material turns out to be the cheapest material around as well.




  • I’m unable to fathom how someone is able to harm or kill their children or family. I literally cannot comprehend how someone has that in them.

    That’s not the point though. The point is that this isn’t a one-off occurrence. It’s terrifying how often people end up murdering their spouse and/or children, it happens somewhere in the world every day, and has been documented to happen throughout history. Thus, it’s clear that even though most of us can’t even comprehend how anyone could do something like this, it’s reductionist to write it off as “inhuman”. It’s very clear that a terrifying amount of people have it in them to do something like this under the correct circumstances. Most of those people probably couldn’t even imagine how anyone could commit a crime like this before they themselves do it.

    It’s sickening, and it’s evil, but it’s very clearly a human behaviour. I still have an urge to call it “inhuman” because the behaviour is so unimaginable to me, as it is for most people.



  • Oh, they’re absolutely selling weapons to war criminals that use them to commit crimes, I 100 % agree.

    Just wanted to clarify that “persuing fleeing targets” isn’t a war crime, it’s the targeting of civilians itself that is. Your statement,

    It’s unreal that they can just say “We design war crimes”

    Made it sound like you thought chasing down fleeing targets was itself a war crime, regardless who the target was.

    I can see there being some changes to laws of war, or at least interpretation in response to drone warfare. Specifically, there’s a law against “causing unnecessary suffering” which prevents the use of weapons designed with the intent to maim rather than kill. Most countries have banned anti-personnel mines, and use this as part of the reasoning (another being the non-directed nature of the weapons, and long-term effects after the war is over).

    Drone-dropped grenades have a clear tendency to wound rather than kill, and I can see an argument that when infantry throw grenades they usually follow up with gunfire rather than leaving the enemy in a field. With this in mind, I can see an argument against drone-dropped light grenades. Then again, drone-dropped grenades give such a massively asymmetric advantage that I have a hard time seeing any army giving them up.


  • There is a whole lot of terrible shit going on in Gaza, and Israel is committing war crimes all over the place.

    However, chasing down and shooting a fleeing enemy combatant is not a war crime. If a russian soldier tries to flee from a failed assault, Ukrainian troops are free to shoot them in the back. The same applies to troops fleeing a position that is being attacked or encircled. They can be hunted down and shot unless they surrender.

    I’m pointing it out because it’s a common misconception the enemies that are unarmed, wounded or fleeing are “out of bounds”, but that’s not the case. It’s perfectly legal to bomb an enemy camp full of sleeping soldiers, or shoot an unarmed or wounded enemy that hasn’t surrendered.

    The absolutely horrifying thing with Israel is that they treat starving civilians as if they were soldiers, and shoot unarmed civilian kids in the back.


  • I’ll answer this even though the user got banned, in case anyone else is reading.

    First of all: All honour to every Ukrainian for fighting this fight. I can only hope that my countrymen and I would show a fraction of the spirit and resilience that the Ukrainian people have shown in standing up to the invader if our country is attacked.

    To address the point: I would support a joint European volunteer force assisting Ukraine on the ground. However, I’ll be completely honest, I’m not personally willing to risk my life for Ukraine. I think we should massively increase our support, and I’m willing to accept heavy economic hardships, but I haven’t signed up to the foreign legion.

    The simple truth is that we don’t have a defence alliance, and I wouldn’t expect any Ukrainian to risk their life in defence of my country either. Some would argue that they’re doing just that right now, and there would be some truth to it, but until I see a direct threat to my country or another that I have an obligation to defend, I’m not willing to put my life on the line.

    To re-emphasise though, I’m willing to go very far until that point. In the upcoming elections my vote is going to whatever party pushes for the most support to Ukraine. I’ll happily eat higher taxes, more inflation, and less government services. I’ve donated most of my best personal winter gear, as well as cash, to the AFU. I think we should do a lot more to help the heroes on the ground fighting off the russian horde.

    Glory to Ukraine.







  • thebestaquaman@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.worldThe Copilot Delusion
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    18 days ago

    They’re getting downvoted because they’re missing the point. It’s not about whether or not I can choose to do things the way I prefer. It’s about how newcomers exposure, and thus opportunity to get into these things, is limited. The arguments about cars or calculators don’t hold up for that exact reason: The existence of cars and calculators does not severely limit people’s exposure to the experience of walking or doing arithmetic.





  • I would say that the “bad part of town” usually has overlap with the poorer part of town, regardless of what skin colour people have there. Of course, especially in the US, there’s significant overlap between economic status and skin colour. I just hate how the typical American view on “race” is projected onto other countries.

    Americans typically have this hang-up on “race” that you really don’t find anywhere else. A lot of places you have talk about “ethnicity” or similar, but the American fascination with categorising people by their skin colour and then using that to make generalisations is pretty unique.