I was a little confused on initial read, but I missed that it was a counting machine, not a voting machine.

Agreed. But you can do both. No amount of regulation of algorithms is going to prevent the developmental harm that does to developing minds (not that I have any evidence for that).

I’m surprised that there was any evidence of the fraud left to find!

Jesus, this idea that ‘parents need to take responsibility’. Social Media companies spend billions to tune their products to be as addictive and consuming as it is possible to be. Children have undeveloped brains which are particularly susceptible to social media influences. It’s like saying we should have heroine and cocain freely available to all and ‘parents need to take responsibility’ if they don’t want their kids to be addicts!

No, here is usually some redundancy designed in - by having 3 or 4 units, so if one fails there is a backup. But only the OEM is allowed to maintain the kit under contract. And surprise surprise, the terms of the repair contract usually involve insane rates for contractors and spare parts. Which the OEM withholds to extort even more.

I know what you’re saying, but if a company is valued at 10 billion for instance, then gets revalued down to 100mil, that difference has not gone anywhere, it has simply ceased to exist. And if you had invested 100k to own 0.001% of the 10 billion company, you now only own 0.001% of a 100 million company. Your investment has lost its value, with whatever implications that has for you. The value hasn’t shifted around, it’s ceased to exist!

It doesn’t work like this though. If your pension fund is heavy into a company that suddenly loses 90% of its value, your pension suddenly becomes worth a lot less…

This is a long term investment, predicting that the bubble will burst _at some point _. It doesn’t signify that he believes the collapse to be imminent. The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent!

They weren’t already part of it? I doubt that!

I’ve heard all I need to hear from you - you are trying to claim that the current genocide is justified based on the potential genocide that could happen if Israel doesn’t completely exterminate Palestine. It’s a bullshit argument, I’ve heard it before, it’s insulting.

Yet here you are, trying to justify genocide.

There is no video that will make me agree with genocide, and to try is insulting.

MAGA youth?

Yeah, i ised take out before, it took 2 weeks to download my photos, i think 8 60gb downloads. It was painful, I got hopeful that youbhad discovered a workaround.

How is this served? Do they send a usb drive? Or a download link of some sort?

This is a good idea - get the young fit and healthy. Could send them to camps where they learn about health and fitness, maybe even practical outdoor skills as well. We coukd call it something like l The ‘Trump Youth’!

Noooooo! I’m shocked!

Can’t wait to see what the “panels thst that offer context about it’s history” will say…

Well dont I look the fool. I’m pissed off now, I didn’t watch the video. Inhave seen like 3 where tthisnsame judge throws out the case based on an illigal stop. Ill find them tomorrow. As to yoir question, you keep leaving oit the illigal part. Yes, not providing ID is an offence if the initial stop is legal. Now you are again correct, the officer does claim that the driver wasn’t wearing a seat belt, so I suppose the initial stop can be justified, which makes refusing to ID an offence.

Well, I watch the video when it camentonlohht a fewndays ago, I don’t remember anything about the aeatbelt. But the reason the officer gave to the driver was driving without headlights in inclement weather, which would only be a violation if the weather were inclement, which it wasn’t, and the driver states that. The officer doesn’t get to change his mind as to the reason for the stop, thats well established in law.

As to physically resisting, the driver did not physically resist, he passively resisted, refusing to unlock the car door andnexit the vehicle. He didn’t at any point lay hands on the officers.

A stop where the initial stop was deemed unconstitutional: Here’s one . The first one on YouTube. I admit I haven’t watched this one, but then same judge is on YouTube presiding over dozens of similar cases, and there are many other similar videos.