Part of being open source is subsequent licensing. This would allow any others to piggyback and avoid the fee.

I don’t know what AI is, but I’m going to talk like I’m an expert.

Yes I’ve already addressed your asinine view.

Seriously? A chatbot is one function of an ai, not the other way around. So when you give the ai a different task or set of instructions, it’s no longer the chatbot anymore, it’s whatever function that’s needed for that task.

I weep for humanity if you’re any indication of the general education on ai….

If you ask it to create an image, are you seriously expecting it to have a conversation and point out where you messed up? That’s not how any of this works lmfao. “Hey I need to point out that ducks don’t have scales, and the sky isn’t green.” No it does what it’s asked. But now suddenly it’s different? Why?

. I am not talking about other types of machine learning.

Then you are making up you own conversation instead of following the thread?

The person presented a specific task to an AI, where does a chatbot come in? You seem to be confused about what Ai is, and that’s what I pointed out, thanks for making it clear.

Yet that wasn’t the point they even made! Lmfao nice reaching there.

Those would be the same type of points a human would make to accomplish the task.

You seem to be ignoring the facts. It was told the image was fake, and told to explain why. Even a human that knows it’s real would still do what was presented to it.

The person told the ai a very specific thing to do, with not room for variance, it wasn’t even stated as a question, they made a demand and any human in the same position would act the same way. If you’re expecting to have to tell a human a 100 times that “yes the image is real, can you do the task presented” is more efficient and better then it being done?

Now you could also present the task as both being able to question it, the ai would follow instructions better.

Back to situation one, while with the human you would be constantly interrupted, is that a good employee or subject? Or one you would immediately replace as it can’t even follow basic instructions? Ai or human, you would point to do the task at hand, yes critical thinking is important, but not for this stupid task. Stop applying instructions and context that never existed in the first place. In a one for one example, the Ai would question too, if you can’t understand this, you shouldn’t be commenting on Ai.

Ai sucks, but don’t ignore reality to make your asinine point.

But they didn’t ask it a question… They specifically told it the image was fake and explain why. That’s not a question, that’s a task.

clearly, they asked it a question that average joe would do

Clearly (as you so incorrectly pointed out a question….)The lack of basic reading comprehension being shown here exactly explains the issue perfectly.

It’s not people relying on it, it’s people using it for stuff it’s not meant for!

It’s not a conversation tool when you present it with a specific task….

Do you not understand even the basic premise of how ai works?

Then what are doing? Complaining it did exactly what you instructed it to do?

What else did you expect?

I get circle jerking against ai is hip and fun, but this isn’t even one of the valid errors it makes. This is just pure human error lmfao.

Why would it have to? It and the person doing the task already knows to do any task put in front of it. It’s one of a hundred photos for all it and the person knows.

You are extending context and instructions that doesn’t exist. The situation would be, both are doing whatever task is presented to them. A human asking would fail and be removed. They failed order number one.

You could also setup a situation where the ai and human were both capable of asking. The ai won’t do what it’s not asked, that’s the comprehension lacking.

Wait, you’re surprised it did what you asked of it?

There’s a massive difference between asking if something is fake, and telling it it is and asking why.

A person would make the same type of guesses and explanations if given the same task.

All this is showing is, you and ALOT of other people just don’t know enough about AI to be able to have a conversation about it.

It even says “suggests” in it, it’s making no claim that it’s real or fake. The lack of basic comprehension is the issue here.

Fucking LOL, they responded and guess what, you were wrong! What a shocker!

https://lemmy.world/comment/20811506

You know what they say about assuming? Makes an ASS out of you and me, but you’re the only ass here, but that’s also not surprising. Since you’re just a petty little troll.

lol, seriously? Do you check your comments religiously to see how they are being voted on? This has to be the saddest thing I’ve seen online in long while.

Mind you, from your comments we can see that you’re just an incredibly aggressive person and frequently get downvoted. So of course you would want to know who it is and harass them.

You’re exactly the reason public logs are an issue. You think every thing is a slight against you. Don’t say stupid shit, don’t get downvoted, what a shocker.

Ah yes, downvote a couple stupid comments you’ve made and suddenly I went through “days”.

How petty and sad is it that you even went and looked lol?

Did you miss the detail about the VENDOR increasing price? Their build cost went up, not the price. This would happened irregardless of tariffs, and is expected.

I guess if you ignore details they specify, you could take that from their comment.

But again, person is just bitching for the sake of bitching, the provided details show they either don’t understand how the system work, or just bitching.

They want to applauded for doing what they agreed to, it’s bloody laughable. As a small business owner myself it’s attitudes like this that make the rest look bad.

So they want the government to fix a regular issue with quoted work…? The price is expected to change, that’s why you quote to begin with…. It’s likely they don’t even know how their system works.

That’s even worse lmfao.

It’s quoted work, it’s volatile already, and the customers game it if they know the material goods in going down. Don’t like it? Don’t quote work. It’s not even a relevant detail to their gripe, just bitching for the sake of bitching at this point.

The price would be different with or without tariffs, but complain without realizing how the system works I guess.

What do you think quoted price means…? That’s the risk you take when you quote stuff and prices change within the time they accept it.

Lots of material goods change prices daily.

Not holding up your original quoted price is how you lose business and your business in general. You seem to think that you can just choose to not hold up your end of the agreed upon contract? Yikes.

But hey, such a good business doing what you originally agreed to!

Than pay debit.

And how do you suppose that works with taxes?

It’s averaged out, the next purchase you make will likely be .02 and rounded down saving you money.

In fact, you can game this to MAKE money too!

How did you get that point from my comment?

So… that means one side of Gaza is sensible and the other isn’t? That’s the only take after their last comment.