

The article criticized the closing of the Internet by Tehran, but the Internet is clear vulnerability that can be exploited in times of war.


The article criticized the closing of the Internet by Tehran, but the Internet is clear vulnerability that can be exploited in times of war.


I can’t wait for our Indian overlords to do the same soon. We can’t get enough money.


That guy (Rich) got a big piece of shit up his ass. He goes all the way to quote Socrates. It’s funny.


This is just trolling, at this point.
Creating unbiased public, open-source alternatives to corporate-controlled models.
Unbiased? I don’t think that’s possible, sir.


I think many people wouldn’t like to live under a “Nerd Reich”, so it’s only natural that there is a mainstream article against that. I’m assuming people who don’t understand anything about the technology that keeps their attention most of the time are concerned about the possibility. Society losing grip over itself, that is, language (social skills) not being the primary characteristic of the successful anymore. That is a blow conventional people won’t take easily.


Awesome discussion.


People not accepting that other people got a easier time doing certain things than others is certainly a problem, but too much blaming isn’t good as well.


It doesn’t matter if they’re nerds or not. What matters is where society is swaying to.


I think that if the algorithm is so broken to the point of only listing things that are interesting to Google, the search is beyond redemption.
I think that if we work together as people we can achieve more than just a couple of good organizations that can fade. That doesn’t mean I wouldn’t donate to Wikipedia or Internet Archive. The goal isn’t to compete, it isn’t a business. Just to make things stronger.
How does it work? Does it download all Wikipedia or any other website I point it to (like Project Gutenberg as it says on the website) pages or does it download it when I access the page?


Both the Internet Archive and Wikipedia are really important. I guess the way is to make alternatives or datahoard in these difficult times.


Crawling the web is an important right for access of information. I think big crawlers shouldn’t dominate the market. Especially since Google isn’t up to par to find anything that is wanted anymore.


You see this on GitHub already. People publish paper results and manuals, along with a few files, and treat that as if it were open source. And this isn’t limited to LLMs, people with CNN papers or crawlers and other results publish a few files and the results on GitHub as if it were open source. I think this is a clash between current scientific community thinking + Big Tech vs Free Software + Free Culture initiatives.
Additionally, you can’t expect something Microsoft/Meta touches to remain untainted for long.
This is common in rolling releases, but Pop OS isn’t a rolling release distro. Maybe a package you installed or something similar?
With a Wi-Fi adapter on Desktop?
I think for the big apps like Whatsapp and Facebook it makes sense that the companies want to hide the features that give users control beyond the “standard” way of using the app in places where they cannot find it.