Doesn’t defend!? They’re straight up just posting the stream keys…

Specifically the “open” web. They recently said the web was thriving from their point of view. Since they’re a major part of what is “closing” the web.

Why would you even think otherwise? They’re corrupt to the point where one of them has been openly shown and proven to accept bribes.

That’s their goal for sure, what I mean is how are they pretending to justify it?

The same way they always do: “WONT SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!?!?!?!1111”

Many billionaires live on a man made island ioff the coast of Florida?

It’s inside the Miami metropolitan area.

Last cenus was in 2020, showing 41 homes and 84 people across 0.43 sq mi/1.11km². It is sometimes referred to as “Billionaire bunker”, because it’s a gated community on an island, and the one bridge in and out has a police checkpoint, it also apparently has its own government and law enforcement. If you try to get close by water, a police boat shows up.

Exactly. They “crawl” category/tag lists, etc. and follow links. And if there are no links to those pages, they wont be indexed.

(Depending on some settings. For all I know they’ve set up “hidden redirects” for popular crawlers to pages that show them)

edit: right, respective tags list no porn games anymore.

Which could cause them to no longer be indexed by search engines depending on other settings. So you’d need to find direct links from other websites.

Deindexed/delisted, not removed.

Try putting the names into the search field on the site, or browsing for them in the categories they are in.

If you do a “germany walmart before:2023” search, you’ll find a bunch of English articles about the whole ordeal. It was in Forbes, NYT, etc. almsot twenty years ago because of how badly they failed on multiple levels.

Yeah, I’ve had a fiber cable running all the way into my apartment for over a decade, and directly into my router for years.

Once again, America shows how “free” they actually are.

And to show that the protection is not theoretical in Europe: Walmart implemented that policy when they tried getting into the German market twenty years ago. They were so insistent that it took a judge to tell them to stop it since it was against the law(It’s sraight up against the first and second article of the German constitution, which protects personal freedom).

Are you just waking up from a coma? Because they’ve been pretty open about wanting to privatize the government and run it like a business. Mitt Romney basically campaigned on that over a decade ago.

Control the weather. Target individuals. How can anyone get this stupid?

Most of the out-there conspiracy people just don’t understand something(in this case climate change), and invent/attached themselves to a fantasy where they’ve “seen through the lies” and everyone else is wrong. A lot of them actually know deep down that they’re wrong, but ironically they don’t want to be seen as stupid for admitting they don’t understand. That’s why they love using phrases that indicate non-believers are dumb, followers/sheep, or that deniers just don’t understand, etc.

TL;DR: They’re too stupid to realize they’re acting stupid.

There’s also quite a few people in the US who are catholic in name only, and are actually against the pope/vatican. It’s so bad that last year the vatican ended up excommunicating an Italian archbishop and former diplomat to the US, because over the years he’d gone full blown conspiracy theorist maga. To the point where he was ranting about the new world order and called pope Francis a servant of Satan.

I hope for your sake that you haven’t actually the seen pictures or clips of the event, and that you’re just parroting things you’ve heard.

Yeah, for some reason they’ve seemed to made it harder to find the actual start menu settings instead of more generic taskbar settings. So that’s a fair point.

Windows has this “feature”, where is the setting?

I assume youre talking about W11?

Because the “Show recently added apps” setting is third option in the start menu settings on W10.

While you’re right to be skeptical, if they just wanted to collect data they would have an Android version. And their stated reason for not supporting it, is that push notifications on Android would require them to at store device-IDs, which they want to avoid for privacy reasons and being vulnerable to subpoenas.

deleted by creator

I wonder how many hundreds of millions of dollars they’ve set aside for settlements.