As someone who owns several RISC-V devices the primary thing preventing usable (low end) RISC-V laptops is the GPUs. Most RISC-V silicon has Imagination GPUs, and the current state of the drivers there is “proprietary drivers stuck on an old LTS kernel.”

If someone makes an RVA23 compliant chip with open mainstreamable drivers and a BXS-4-64 GPU (or, better yet, somehow manages to license a GPU from Intel or AMD for it), that’ll be a cash cow.

That’s why it tastes so good.

Maybe I’d eat there if they sold food.

They don’t in general, but things that do heavily detailed graphics work (like your compositor or browser) or lots of cryptography work on the CPU can get a bit more out of those newer instructions than many other programs.

Very approximately, things that Gentoo offers prebuilt versions of because compiling them is so resource intensive are often the things that can get the best benefit out of your architecture variant. (Not singling out Gentoo here as an example of “doing it badly” - they do the sensible thing by providing these prebuilt binaries, but in some ways it defeats the purpose of optimised source distributions.)

It’s a Hard Problem™ to solve.

Finally, Donald Trump doing something good by protecting Americans from the hell that is LAX!

Look I don’t have heat in the winter so I compile Firefox for various processors to keep my bedroom warm okay?

The irony is that big things like Firefox can get the most advantages from building for your specific CPU variant, especially if you use them frequently.

Another win for Linux!

My response isn’t “abandon law” either.

Newsmax? They’ve gone too far for Newsmax?

Wow.

I don’t answer irrelevant questions from harassers. Stop harassing me.

Stop harassing me.

I think it’s pretty clear that many in power don’t believe the constitution applies to them. That’s not doomerism, because my answer isn’t “therefore we must give up.”

Cool, so go ahead and use one and stop harassing me.

Lol ok really are desperate aren’t you? Unfortunately, pathetic berating isn’t going to make me do your research for you. Search engines exist. You can use one to answer your own question at any time.

You seem like you’re desperate to find this out because someone else asked you and you don’t know how to use DuckDuckGo. Otherwise you wouldn’t be insistent on bringing up that irrelevant question.

I’m glad we’ve established that we both agree that ICE agents deserve due process. It took far longer than I expected to get agreement on that simple topic out of you.

Wait… Are you repeatedly asking me this because you don’t know and are desperate to find out? You do know that search engines exist to help you with this, right? You don’t have to pathetically beg some stranger to do your research for you.

I asked a simple yes or no question. Do you believe ICE agents deserve due process?

Refusing to answer your irrelevant questions doesn’t make me ignorant of the topic.

Do you think ICE agents deserve due process? Why or why not?

You can’t even show that you’re competent enough to show why your question is relevant, and yet you expect me to prove myself? Try again dude.

And I’ve already answered what I think should be done with ICE agents. My answer of “due process” was that sent you off into this irrelevant discussion in the first place.

Cool, so you do understand that immigration law isn’t the right framework for determining what to do with ICE agents. Why do you keep asking irrelevant questions then?