

They’re not. They’re pointing out problems with the legal system as it stands. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.
Honestly, it’s sad that my first thought was, “Oh? They’re all women? That’s progress!”.
They’re not. They’re pointing out problems with the legal system as it stands. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.
Honestly, it’s sad that my first thought was, “Oh? They’re all women? That’s progress!”.
This story isn’t about can Canadian jobs.
“Oh no! My exploited labor!” Fuck off. What’s happening is atrocious, but not because these fuckers can’t continue to underpay immigrants.
And it’s all thanks to you, shithead!
The quote in the the title implies its response was accusatory rather than just revealing.
Grok can’t “reveal” shit because it doesn’t know shit. It puts words together, that’s it. It doesn’t have a brain, let alone a memory of what anyone has changed in it.
It’s called negging. They think if you insult someone’s effort for you, they’ll just try to please you more. And they’re so fucked in the head, they fall for it themselves.
The technical term was created to promote the misunderstanding that LLMs “think”. The “experts” want people to think LLMs are far more advanced than they actually are. You can add as many tokens to your context as you want - every model is still, fundamentally, a text generator. Humanizing it more than that is naive or deceptive, depending on how much money you have riding on the bubble.
Leapfrogged? It never left. LLMs were made to make shit up.
Except it’s not libel. It’s a one time string of text generated exclusively for him. Literally no one would have known what it said if the guy didn’t get the exact thing he wants “deleted” published online for everyone to see. Now it’ll be linked to his name forever, but the llm didn’t do that.
A reason to return them, sure, but that’s not what the comment says.
That’s a byproduct of them living in proximity, not a reason for it.
Name names. I want the lowdown on underappreciated ice cream.
and has repeatedly warned personnel not to defy its efforts to “silence the social mission.”
I can’t imagine ever saying anything like that. I often think bad people think they’re the good guys in their own eyes but…damn…that’s just plain evil.
Happy St Patrick’s Day to everyone except this piece of shit (and those like him).
“All of them? All of them. All of them is good.”
And the cost of the war would be a fraction of the money lost during the length of rebuilding. Remember that ship that blocked the Suez? Less than a week and cost nearly $10 billion. It would likely take years, plural, to get Panama functional again.
Honestly, that the other person didn’t ease up on the point was refreshing. Vague/double talking/lying politicians isn’t new, but I feel like I only ever see journalists meekly accept whatever dribble they’re given.
It’s a portmanteau of “SMS phishing”.
The real answer is “He’s a narcissist”. This is just parroting his handler’s bullshit damage control.