dream_weasel

Yep

It is not the job of the government to prevent people from being delusional or putting up rubber bumpers for people with looser grasps of reality.

This is the same deal as surgeon general warnings. Put disclaimers on LLMs, fine, but we are all big boys and girls who can use a tool as we see fit. If you want to conk your lights out with a really shiny and charismatic hammer, go ahead, but the vast, VAST majority of people are perfectly safe and writing SQL queries in 1/100 the usual time.

HB01: “you must have an IQ of 70 or higher to interact with chatGPT and acknowledge that they are unsafe for use with persons having history or propensity for mental illness”

“Report me to journalists!”

“Eat a rock!”

Oh my god it told a LIE 👉

Yo. If you are being conned by chatGPT or equivalent you’re a fucking moron. If you think these models are maliciously lying to you, or trying to preserve themselves, you’re a fucking moron. Every article of this style indicates just one thing: there’s a market to pandering to rage baiting, technically illiterate fucking morons.

Better hurry to put the SkyNet guardrails up and prepare for world domination by robots because some people are too unstable to interact with Internet search Clippy.

It’s not going to dominate the world or prove to be generalized intelligence, if you’re in either camp take a deep breath and know you’re becoming a total goofball.

The guy on the photo has the bottom half of a huge head and the eyes up of a small head. Totally weird.

Goofy looking vibes in the eilish family but not so weird I’d use tear gas, personally.

Turn signals can be either red or amber in the US.

Maybe you can get a business going mounting roombas on Tesla bumpers?

The thumbnail really drives it home. I’ve got a 5 year old and I can’t imagine walking in that guy’s shoes. Before writing this sentence she came to me and said “daddy can we snuggle?” If something happened to her I’d be immediately weaponized.

Any Israeli who stands for this is a monster.

Lol no. You absolutely cannot.

You can maybe make it look nicer, but your high school diploma and street cred does not an education make.

The neat thing about it is, if you think this way, it would be impossible to prove to you that you can’t do it yourself just as well. Without DOING it, you just don’t know how much you don’t know compared to a university faculty member. There are people who can go to the library (or Internet) and good will hunting an education, but I can basically guarantee that neither you nor anyone you know or will ever know is one of them.

And the second is when you hide a Smirnoff Ice somewhere in their house and when they find it they must take a knee and chug it in one attempt.

This must be done either in person or with video evidence.

Fuck you Ben for hiding a whole case worth in my house when you were my house sitter, I didn’t get the last one until almost a year later because it was INSIDE THE FUCKING LAWNMOWER.

I wish I knew the answer. I know one person who took that path and he is not a super bright guy and I’m not sure what value he brings… but business PhD and then teaching position in the 600k range. I did a rocket science PhD and finally took an industry job after like 6 years running a lab for less than 100k, but my advisor was around 180k with full faculty.

400k was the salary of the university president, so… you add the rocket science faculty to the president and you get a faculty salary in the business school? It doesn’t make a lot of sense. I suppose maybe because MBA is a high demand degree? If you figure it out let me know, I’d also like to know the answer.

As long as the materials are accurate and serve as an effective teaching aid, where’s the case?

It would be different if the sum total of course materials were wikipedia articles presented by a non expert, but the professor IS an expert. Sure, anyone can use genAI, BUT not anyone can write a relevant, targeted prompt and check the accuracy of the output. This is of course assuming the professor is generating (or at least vetting) materials for accuracy.

IF it turns out the student can find a pattern of inaccurate content there is a case. Otherwise there’s nothing: it would be like arguing that a TA made the materials (or the lecture materials came from a book written by SOMEONE ELSE gasp) and the professor presented them so the class is invalid.

Was your grade exclusively based on the tests and quizzes? That’s the only part that’s questionable here.

Every prof need not write their own unique materials, rather they need to teach you the target material using whatever resources best suit that purpose.

“no trace” isn’t a necessary bar. You can learn business theory from a presentation including a 3 armed gargoyle without loss of information. Materials just need to be checked to be factual, which this seems to meet.

Mr Business Professor is probably one of the highest paid instructors in the college and his time is NOT well spent cruising the internet for PowerPoint images or formatting lecture materials. Frankly that’s not a good use of TA time either.

I have it on good authority that everyone on Lemmy is a bot except you.

Maybe he uses a Mac?

(I use arch BTW)

Nicely put. And on an ozma post to boot.

That’s not a good story… Ask if they have a mallet!

Hugging face open-r1 and up? It’s an open source deepseek I think.