That HyperCam 2 had better be unregistered.

Sounds great for non-food packages, such as small electronics, toys, etc. Anything that currently comes in a blister pack.

It’s not - this dude doesn’t zap himself even once.

It’s a good video though, showing how he integrated everything.

They could have done better though, for example ‘won’t lift’ could be something like “keeps”

Only if they don’t spend more time reviewing and fixing errors in the generated documentation than they would have just writing it in the first place.

I don’t remember hearing about it before. I might have, but even if so the reminder is helpful.

Yes.

(But it wasn’t his choice, someone added him.)

It is bad writing. That paragraph (and the title) makes it sound like it was considered in the past and they are asking that it be considered again.

If you switch a reasonable amount of your shopping there and get the “executive” membership, it will literally pay for itself. (Because it gives a few percent back, and that is enough to cover the membership fee)

There’s not much Krebs in it

As far as I know it’s not commonly used anywhere, and is mostly used for effect.

I think it used to be more common in my parents’ generation.

English.

The word that’s throwing you off is probably wont

wont

(archaic or humorous) One's habitual way of doing things; custom, habit, practice. 

Why not just use the stored charge multiplied by the average cell discharge voltage at max load for Watt-hours? This may even encourage them not to go overboard on max load ratings.

Sure it could be a bit higher than what the user gets after voltage conversion, but if they are not maxing it they may get better?

I’m no electrical engineer, so this question isn’t actually rhetorical - I’m wondering if this would work.

Wooo!

" He… He’s a special ops trainer.

What was his name?

Yeah. Jack Trainer.

So he’s a trainer named Jack Trainer?

That’s how I have everybody in my phone. See, “Janice Mom.”

“Larry Doorknob.” “Stacy Butt Stuff.” "

Nestle might be all over that. It’s not like they care about their reputation among the well informed.

I hadn’t actually considered that, but I don’t trust them to only be redacting the victims.

I agree, but I think I can guess why they do that - they can maybe get total income from aggregate tax records, but disposable income would have to be asked individually.

Imagine the streaming revenue.

Just do it outdoors?