That does work (actually ‘non emergency city state’). But as another comment mentions, the public knowing it exists is more important than the number itself.

So they are asking a virtual roulette wheel to make the determination if it’s an emergency or not.

I think the non-emergency number should be heavily advertised. I have no idea what the local one for me is (if it even exists)

And an LLM determining that accurately would be a dice roll.

Summaries that look good are something LLMs can do, but not summaries that actually have a higher ratio of important/unimportant than the source, nor ones that keep things accurate. That last one is super mandatory on something like an encyclopedia.

That HyperCam 2 had better be unregistered.

Sounds great for non-food packages, such as small electronics, toys, etc. Anything that currently comes in a blister pack.

It’s not - this dude doesn’t zap himself even once.

It’s a good video though, showing how he integrated everything.

They could have done better though, for example ‘won’t lift’ could be something like “keeps”

Only if they don’t spend more time reviewing and fixing errors in the generated documentation than they would have just writing it in the first place.

I don’t remember hearing about it before. I might have, but even if so the reminder is helpful.

Yes.

(But it wasn’t his choice, someone added him.)

It is bad writing. That paragraph (and the title) makes it sound like it was considered in the past and they are asking that it be considered again.

If you switch a reasonable amount of your shopping there and get the “executive” membership, it will literally pay for itself. (Because it gives a few percent back, and that is enough to cover the membership fee)

There’s not much Krebs in it

As far as I know it’s not commonly used anywhere, and is mostly used for effect.

I think it used to be more common in my parents’ generation.

English.

The word that’s throwing you off is probably wont

wont

(archaic or humorous) One's habitual way of doing things; custom, habit, practice. 

Why not just use the stored charge multiplied by the average cell discharge voltage at max load for Watt-hours? This may even encourage them not to go overboard on max load ratings.

Sure it could be a bit higher than what the user gets after voltage conversion, but if they are not maxing it they may get better?

I’m no electrical engineer, so this question isn’t actually rhetorical - I’m wondering if this would work.

Wooo!

" He… He’s a special ops trainer.

What was his name?

Yeah. Jack Trainer.

So he’s a trainer named Jack Trainer?

That’s how I have everybody in my phone. See, “Janice Mom.”

“Larry Doorknob.” “Stacy Butt Stuff.” "