I’m an anarchocommunist, all states are evil.
Your local herpetology guy.
Feel free to AMA about picking a pet/reptiles in general, I have a lot of recommendations for that!
I mean 8 crashes is not a lot to work with statistically to the point where this is nearly meaningless.
i’ve seen a car crash as soon as it came off the lot and if I cherrypicked that and 7 other crashed cars I’d probably consider that brand very unsafe.
I don’t see how this gives sample size, are you considering every mile a sample?
i’m not worried about the sample size for regular cars but there’s like 10 of these driving right now.
no you wouldn’t, it would just make it less accurate
it’s correct that 8 is not the sample size, but they didn’t give the sample size, it would be how many cars there are and the number of miles, not just the number of miles, they also didn’t establish fault and this was with a human in the loop, i’m all for hating elon but this isn’t worth reporting without more info.
This is based on a sample size of 8
It’s significantly easier to use and I wanted to create a maximally ergonomic setup that I designed the ux for.
windows wouldn’t let me choose, linux did, also when linux has an issue it’s never because someone was doing something malicious, on windows it nearly always is.
I would totally buy it if I had money to waste, I would love to be able to take my tablet anywhere with me like this and don’t care about the size of phones, they fit fine in my pockets.
He would say that was not an LLM and therefore does not apply here.
I wish I could get info about north korea that isn’t from a totally untrustworthy source, dailynk is nonsense
https://www.mintpressnews.com/the-daily-nk-news-north-korea-brought-by-cia/285873/
Sure but these things are not remotely comparable.
It really doesn’t require much aside from backing up, I can have a linux system up and running with a complete beginner in 30 minutes or so.
Except this is free
So many people have successfully argued against claims I did not make.
https://www.emergentmind.com/papers/2409.06185
https://huggingface.co/papers/2409.04109
ai does new things all the time and this is easily validated and explained with the concept of temperature.
It is validated, yale confirmed that it is the case that a novel hypothesis was generated, it was not REPRODUCED, which is irrelevant to my claim that they created a novel hypothesis.
i see how that wording is confusing.
It doesn’t have to be to invalidate the claim. It proposed a novel hypothesis, this is the easiest thing to check in the world.
since I don’t have to rely on google it really doesn’t have to even be a decent source.
You have not said one thing i did not already know, none of it has to do with anything
an ai did something novel, this is an easily verified fact. The only alternative is that somebody else wrote the hypothesis.
He knows the basics, it’s just that they don’t lead to any of the conclusions he’s claiming they do. He also boldly assumes that everyone who disagrees with him doesn’t know anything. He’s a beast of confirmation bias.
I mean I think we all think that is very unfair.