That’s a single clip (the only clip) and then additional clips about said clip.

If he shocks his dog to get her to obey, there wouldn’t be one clip of it, there would be dozens. The dude streams 48-56 hours a week and this is the only time? How would that be possible? It doesn’t pass the sniff test.

He’s had dozens of people come to stream with him. Someone would’ve said something by now, but it’s only crickets.

These are armchair detectives spurred on by Hasan’s rivals and nothing I’ve seen suggests otherwise.

No. There’s one clip of his dog probably pinching her nail on her bed and yelping and the internet took that as proof of abuse. The collar she wears vibrates, not shocks.

Yes, we’re already at the “rounding them up” stage. They just gotta pretend you’re an illegal long enough for them to “oppsie” remove you from the country.

Oligopolies, monopolies. Potato tomato, potato tomato

Woke right is groypers because they’re “critical of Israel”. Cause they’re nazis

Gas stoves are the Trojan horse for gas heating. Other than that *shrug

Market regulations prevent abuses. Without them, it’s always a race to the bottom. The free market won’t save you, it just mindlessly pursues profits (it literally can’t do otherwise).

And you’re suggesting that democrats reverse direction on a position that’s been a major driver for votes for them for decades now. Yeah, they won’t win your purple county over it, but they’ll definitely not lose all the blue counties they win because of it.

Abortion is a wedge issue because it’s one those things that feels incredibly moral no matter what side you’re on.

Anti-abortion think it’s allowing for murder cause “baby-killing”. I want to give it more depth than that, but that’s about as deep as it goes

Pro-abortion correctly calls that it doesn’t save anywhere near as many babies as it will kill both babies and mothers. A reality we’re seeing play out with the overturn of Roe v Wade

This is one of the unfortunate cases where religions are wrong and will need to adjust to reality. Hell, most evangelicals adjusted to seeing abortion as morally wrong in the last 50 years or so (to convince them to vote republican)

The cool thing about catholicism is that the pope can and does change the rules. He just needs to be proactive on this and explain to his flock why it needs to change.

Really sounds like catholics need to stop being stupid about abortion. You rush to baptize dying newborns cause they now have souls, but there’s no fear for stillborns since they don’t. Maybe aligning that shit with your abortion stance would fix the issue.

Talk to your pope about that, maybe?

Nope. Not even this. Still useless crap. MS Paint would’ve been better.

Holy shit. You’re the first right-winger I’ve seen on lemmy. Pathetic!

Yeah, but was he friendly to the corporate donors? That’s all the current leadership in the party cares about. You need their funding to lose elections in staggering ways

New public toilet opening up.

Why the ai slop? It’s not really needed for anything. You wasted a gallon of water for that?

No. He can’t do tariffs without legislative approval. This is where the house would impeach him due to his blatant disregard of the constitution and the breaking of his path of office. Or the Supreme Court would step in to strip him of his illegal power.

… except the legislature and courts are captured by his party. The founding fathers were fucking idiots for thinking that “each branch competes against the others” without considering what would happen if allies captured all the branches. All of the safeguards against “hasty action” have become the cuffs that bind us against stopping this. They really did just make a king with a troublesome government in his way. And now the government is stepping out of the way.

Yeah, so yeah. Wild speculation. Those are some interesting dots, but they don’t make your unicorn even if you connect them all.

Requires a presidential signature, like most legislation. It could only do anything if it had super majority votes, thus making it veto proof.

Showing that there’s more senate support against this policy isn’t nothing, but I do take your point.

This is some wild fucking speculation. You got any basis for this claim or just vibes?

34% of single-family housing are now rented out. We’re not building enough housing, a fact that hasn’t changed since the housing bubble collapsed. So, a lack of investment in new property, large funds putting money into existing properties instead, and less risky homeowners overall means we don’t really have a housing bubble. We have a supply shortage, leading to high prices. The correction for that isn’t a crash.