

I think so
I think so
My workplace barely groks opportunity cost on their main product, and I’m not responsible for the IT. When it breaks constantly, I say “yeah we know it breaks like this, get them to fix it.”
Not my circus, I just stamp the tickets.
What do you use for video calls with screen share?
My coop uses teams and I want to move them off it.
So now my clients will have a harder time engaging with my product. Great.
It will be funny if they try, because plenty of presentation setups will break
To be fair, the conspiracy nuts are probably being targeted by a Russian psyop, with the goal of sabotaging infrastructure, increase costs etc etc
That’s probably just to compensate for grip strength or range of motion with the knife.
By backwards do you mean point near the elbow? If so you can get more leverage that way.
The researchers are doing the composing, not the organoid. The organoid is just existing.
Interpretations are intentional, transformative etc.
Automating that is not.
I’m referring to completely involuntary movements… Characterising any involuntary, debilitating phenomenon as intentional or artistic is gross.
Characterising involuntary but normal phenomenon as intentional or artistic is maybe a little less gross, but still asinine.
I understand why you think it’s offensive, that’s fine.
It’s about as close to composing as transcribing the twitches of someone with Parkinson’s.
About as respectful as well, if the researcher is the person characterising this process as composing.
Managers.
Alright you have no idea what’s going on
How do I know it’s the website I want to go to and not a fake website
What… Website???
So how do we do trust if we don’t have specific people to trust to issue trust
There’s a point that loops back FYI
Oh, no that would be funny if i made the connection to the author. Did not remember his name.
Yeah I don’t think proving or trying to prove systematic negligence is tilting at windmills.
The progression of a slow decline in competency?