As opposed to the ‘official uniform’ all the others are wearing?

For you, the day free buses graced your village was the most important day in your life, but for me? It was Tuesday.

So safe. This time it was a kid, but next time he might not be so lucky. It could be a delivery driver! The mailman! Someone getting the wrong address! Scary scary times we live in.

But he got away with it, the perfect crime.

‘Independent’

We all know that prohibition in the US was a rousing success!

I just put the words ‘executive order involuntary commitment’ into my search engine of choice and found multiple news articles covering this. I have every faith that you can do the same.

‘Like I said before, tariffs will be in place from 1st July August September, there has been no change to this date’.

Now Dennis, I’ve heard that speed has something to do with it.

Unfortunately, the ‘firing’ is usually a golden handshake and jumping straight into heading another company to run that into the ground too. After multiple rounds of layoffs of course.

Absolutely, and I think jumping on people for making honest mistakes doesn’t help anyone, as with most things it’s the intention that’s key. In this particular case though, I don’t think there was too much ambiguity, and she/her seems to me like the safer bet.

My understanding, and I’m by no means an expert, is that they/them would be used for an unknown gender, or for someone that has chosen those as their preferred pronouns. But in this case, the article and discussion is about a woman, so I think she/her would be the preferred choice.

I dunno, still seems like misgendering someone, just with a different reason for doing so.

The article uses she/her pronouns, which seems a reasonable choice. Any particular reason you’ve gone with they/them?

“Anonymously” at an “auction” was the intended implication, I believe. Where in actuality someone is just paid a lot of money in a manner that is harder to trace, and has an air of plausible deniability.

Go fash, lose cash.

anywhere that follows the rule of law

That’s the beautiful part, apparently that no longer applies to the USA.

“…amid a severe bird flu outbreak that has led to the culling of millions of egg-laying chickens.”

It’s included in the summary, which is taken from the article.

The plaintiffs said some of the regulations on Planned Parenthood centers were so strict, “most health centers or doctors’ office simply do not meet” them.

I suspect that’s entirely by design.

Reached the point of being more evil than Judge Frollo, congratulations.