It’ll never happen.

When will this stop being news? We know that no one is going to do anything about it, so all this does is outrage everyone until it happens again.

Just list the persons name in memoriam and move on.

The construction will actually cost $300M. The rest goes into his pocket.

It’s remarkably funny how people still think he can be held responsible for anything he has done. It’s one thing for a few judges to stop him from doing something illegal, however it’s entirely different when he goes and does it anyway and arrives at the consequences for his action phase.

Face the truth of this:

No one has either the balls or the authority to hold him accountable. And he knows it.

Good.

Daily reminder that if you still have an account- you are supporting this shit. No excuses.

Why is everyone shocked by this shit? Law one order only applies to those of us that stand against childfucking fascists. The moment you support King Kidfucker with donations in the billions, you’ll be under his kidfucking protection like the rest of them.

If you’re lucky- you might not even have to fuck any kids.

Don’t forget there also fucks kids and they are protecting him.

Reminder that Donald J. Trump fucks children and there is proof of this that they are trying to distract us from in order to protect him and the rest of the kidfuckers.

STAY ON POINT.

People, PLEASE stop coming to America. The government doesn’t want you here. Also, it’s not safe at all.

It’s more stupid shit to flood the zone.

ROFL…

Two entirely different scenarios won’t equate to the same outcome regardless of how much you’d like them to.

One is an illegal payoff that implies an acknowledgement of guilt- the other is a denial of non-mandated service that caused death.

In the US, you are not required by federal law to have Health Insurance. Therefore, denying health insurance services is NOT illegal! So whichever one of you ignorantly tried to tie a Deprived Heart Murder (aka: “reckless endangerment”) to the CEO of a health insurance company, needs to learn how criminal law works, and also should have looked to see if there’s even precedence in a case such as this.

(Yeah… There isn’t by the way)

Now, I’m done arguing this with you. You’re forcing an outcome based on an emotional response, and I’m logically trying to lead you to what is factually true, despite it being something you don’t want to accept.

You want to deny reality- be my guest, but know that bad faith comparisons to force an inaccurate outcome waste time and dilute the water of reasonable discussion.

Enters the trolly problem, exits me. I’m done. lol.

I’ll simplify:

When we start killing people we don’t like, the line gets drawn closer and closer to home.

“Of all the arguments against voluntary euthanasia, the most influential is the ‘slippery slope’: once we allow doctors to kill patients, we will not be able to limit the killing to those who want to die” ~ Peter Singer

“Once you put human life in human hands, you have started on a slippery slope that knows no boundaries.” ~ Leon Lass

lol….

You really need to know how it works before you argue it. I get that one of you looked this up one day- and the rest of lemmy all piled on thinking that it’s a one-and-done legal defense after only just reading about it, but…

Proof of INTENT TO KILL means he’d have to know without question that they would have died, and that they had NO OTHER MEANS to acquire the procedure. This is nearly impossible to prove and the entire defense could rest on this notion alone.

For the record, I’m not agreeing with this shit-

I’m simply pointing out why it’s not so fucking simple as it seems. Everyone here seems to think the easiest solution is the best solution without ever questioning why the easiest solution seems so easy, yet no one has tried it.

Hope this helps:

https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1337&context=dlj

And sadly, despite how horrific it is- at the end of the day, it is legal. He didn’t hunt these people down and end them. He denied them coverage.

This needs to change, but vigilantism clearly isn’t going to do it, and this is evident in the fact that it’s still happening. In fact, I believe it’s even worse now.

But- let’s say we bring the anger to the streets anyway, and full on gun down every CEO that we don’t like. What is stopping us from stopping at CEOs? Why not end regional managers we disagree with? Local managers? What about shift leaders?

Hell… Why even stop at our own places of work? Neighbors? Bad service providers? Anyone is a mark!

Where do we draw the line where murder isn’t okay just because we don’t like what someone does?

There is a reason we have laws in place to stop slippery slopes like this from happening. And we are better than these assholes. They got to do what they do using our system of law- so we will need to use that system of law to stop them.

Murder isn’t the way this is done. This is just how you escalate them putting the military in every city.

Denying treatment isn’t murder. Has no one explained to you what murder means?

Cool! So where you do suppose we draw the line where people are allowed to straight up murder people on the street in cold blood because we don’t like them or what they do?

Because a WHOLE new set of laws need to be in place or this shit turns into the purge.