It is absolutely wild to get into being a bag-holder this late into a hype bubble

In the end, the technical limitations of AI are going to be the real regulation. As much as the grifters of the world will not admit it, you can’t shove a useless technology down peoples throat at hundreds of billions dollars of expense and expect it to have a financial return for you.

I imagine it was put into your device as a recovery drive. So maybe Ventoy & a lightweight ISO of your favorite distribution?

“Hey Lawyers, want to help us commit crimes?”

I feel like there is an underlying issue here you’re trying work around. Why do you not want to update everything together?

Thank you for the archive, because this is not okay

Only corporate executives benefit from AI.

Everyone else is harmed, both directly and indirectly, and it makes the customer experience far worse because workers are replaced by chatbots that are incapable of understanding.

From what I’ve seen, the only people that have a positive view of AI are those who see themselves as the master of others. The trans, nonbinary, & disabled people in this study are very unlikely to fit that mold.

It’s insane the yo-yo scam is still legal. I hope the customer keeps the name after the lawsuit fucks up these predators.

Am I understanding correctly that the most expensive “premium plus” plan still has advertisements?

It is very telling that the big donors would rather try to split the democrat vote than rally behind a popular candidate.

IMO, Dems have to allow the new generations to finally have their say and invite fresh ideas, or fatally break the party.

If they keep letting the money work against their voters, they’re choosing the latter.

I directly work with one of these people - they admit to spending all of their free time talking to the LLM chatbots.

On our work forums, I see it’s not uncommon at all. If it makes you feel any better, AI loving is highly correlated with people you shouldn’t ever listen to in the first place.

“Q.R., using his mother’s old laptop, had unfettered access to the internet and began searching for hardcore pornography,” says the court. His mom claims this led to “pain, suffering, disability, disfigurement, and mental anguish; psychological injury; past and future love of enjoyment and pleasure of living.”

It’s not the internet making your son feel those things, it’s you.

Can these people sue for malicious prosecution and civil rights violations?

You could simply continue to use the older versions - with Linux, you’re not forced to update if you don’t want to. Since it’s open source, you could even continue modifying it freely. I think the people behind Linux are being a bit overkill in supporting older hardware in the most recent releases.

You have to change your steam settings to attempt to use proton. Once you do this, steam will allow the games to play. Practically everything will work once you do this.

I’ve bought Garmin devices explicitly because they didn’t do these things, and promised not to do these things. Since I know they’re not going to retract this decision, I am going to look into trying to get my purchases refunded.

They’re AI so yes

How the hell does the American Arbitration Association think it’s going to bind a third party to a decision? What agreement does Macmillan have with them?

I order the American Arbitration Association to pay me one billion dollars.

This has the same level of validity. Facebook’s stooges can pound sand.

And rolling blackouts in the hottest parts of summer

I’ve never owned a laptop with a GPU, very interesting how that works.

Is it something works out of the box, or do you have to manually set it up?