That last sentence, I parsed it 2 ways and both are appealing.

With all these raids, is ICE doing anything at all that resembles prosecution of the sweatshop owners who hired these so-called “criminals”? (Who we know are just folks making clothes for a living)

I think I know the answer. After all it’s just a rigged numbers game, that’s also why they’re deporting legal immigrants and citizens and people who show up to court for their green cards. In fact they probably hope the owners find new employees for them to cart away next month. It’s much easier than finding any cartel members.

They should have to prove they are who she’s referring to. In other words, prove they are ruthless Trump supporting ‘Jesus’ mfs. She apparently has some in her own family, so she could have been referencing them and not the school at all.

I don’t disagree with any of your points, and I’m not officially challenging the post, but does it fit under Rule 5? It focuses on Delta variant which has mostly been displaced, being considered extinct in many places, and I had to do a certain amount of looking to confirm that more recent variants can also harm the placenta and cause miscarriages. Of course, slashing vaccination rates will likely cause a surge in cases and an opportunity for new moore deadly mutations to emerge, plus the mothers who don’t miscarry won’t be imparting antibodies to their infants for their early days.

COVID placentitis has continued to be documented between this 2022 article and the present. Subsequent variants may damage the placenta to greater or lesser degrees than Delta. But with new restrictions causing a lower vaccination rate, the risk will increase.

“Published 11:04 AM PDT, February 10, 2022”

Does it still count as news?

It has a relevance because of the new vaccine rules, and because the Delta variant could still come roaring back with lowered vaccine rates.

But is this the wrong instance?

Guess your job doesn’t involve saving the lives of hundreds of pregnant women and their babies. I guess if everything you’ve done over the past 10 years was ripped out and thrown away it would destroy nothing of value and you wouldn’t care. And if we hired a bunch of goons to attack you every time you were online and threaten you in person it would have no affect on your mental health. But she did, it was, and it did for her.

The judge should have them locked up for perjury, but would it change anything?

If she had health insurance, the insurance company should sue the state (as well), because they can better afford to. And because this won’t be the only time.

In a catastrophic case like this, they wind up spending more than the family, even though it’s a smaller percentage of their assets. So they have every incentive, and I’m sure the family would be willing to testify towards their case.

The percentage depends a lot of the ppm of fluoride in the water, which is why it’s now set at 0.7 instead of as high as 1.5 in decades past.

But my point still stands that it enters the enamel before any topical application is possible. Which makes me take everything else you say with a large helping of salt

The existence of fluorosis, caused by an excess of fluoride being absorbed during tooth formation, before they begin to erupt, shows you’re wrong.

Obviously education about brushing and flossing and a healthy diet help more, if the family is able to afford the food and toothbrushes and regular dental care. But in areas where (natural or added) fluoride levels in the water are higher (within a limit of 1.5 ppm, twice what is set for when fluoride is added), there is observed to be less tooth decay and better overall dental health even when controlling the data for the elements you cited.

…by strengthening the enamel. Which is a part of the tooth.

Because young children have teeth that aren’t exposed to topical fluoride.

Their future adult teeth, growing under their gums, in their jaws.

The only way to build them strong is from the inside out, by getting fluoride into the children’s systems.

Because children have teeth that aren’t exposed to topical fluoride.

Their future adult teeth, growing under their gums, in their jaws.

The only way to build them strong is from the inside out, by getting fluoride into the children’s systems.

No, I’m saying United Health has already proven their willingness to kill for profit

The company expects to return to growth in 2026, it said on Tuesday.

Translated:

“By 2026 the attention will die down and we can return to denying all treatment.”

Kind of implies they have knowledge Luigi won’t make it to trial…

If so, that church will wind up losing money on it. Because Trump.

Well, it is a win-win. The Episcopal Church is left-leaning, and refusing to continue the sham of refugee resettlement when it’s only Apartheid supporters is a legitimate moral stand to take. But also, separation of Church and State is an important bulwark of democracy, regardless of the denomination.

Sure, and you might even win some, but once your cases get to the Supreme Court they will get shot down anyway.