

Metro Station Route 13
Metro Station Route 13
You know how a judge is supposed to excuse themselves from casting judgements on something that may be tied to their own interests…
How is it the Presidents family can own a media company and his administration is allowed to make ANY changes to current media policies?
Best I can do is use it for small plane trips and powder the top of everything with baking soda. Side effects may include killing all plant life along common routes.
It used to be pertinent to check the color of WD drives. I can’t remember all of them but of the top of my head I remember Blue dying the most. They used to have black, red and maybe a green model, now they have purple and gold as well. Each was designated for certain purposes / reliability.
Source: Used to be a certified Apple/Dell/HP repair tech, so I was replacing hard drives daily.
Yeungling started in 1829 when there was only 24 States. Supposedly the oldest brewery in the U.S.
If this is true, that has got to be infuriating:
“We have known from the beginning that Ajay Dev was wrongfully convicted,” Purcell told the Chronicle. “Judge Beronio was the first judge to really look closely at the evidence and read every document.”
16+ years to get a judge to actually read the documentation, accounts, and listen.
It seems like there are 2 types of charges in the U.S. Those that spend years in prison before getting someone to review the facts, and those who spend years pushing back trials and staying out of jail until eventually they drop the cases without looking at all the evidence.
I guess you have to call a place on solid ground Starbase when everything you build to carry building supplies into space to build a Starbase fails.
Could always throw in some cool salt sculpture activities for the kids in art classes as well (clearly we’d have to much salt haha) If there is an easy way to protect the salt from weathering, making giant salt sculpture museums would be pretty cool. Although they’d fall apart without protections.
Thanks for sharing! A lot of it I saw was about people not locking down phones so kids had access to uninstall and reinstall apps to bypass blocks. Which if the app store / play store is locked to a parents Apple ID, unless the kid knows their password they shouldn’t be able to reinstall the apps. But all the same I agree there will in the end be a way to get around if they try hard enough. That said, what’s to stop someone just installing a 3rd party app store and using that, not sure. Unless the parental controls block .apk files and such.
If you don’t mind me asking, why were you trying to block music though? I would imagine if you block everything, they have more reason to try to find work arounds. If they have access to music and videos that are just filtered for porn/lewd or what not content, they have less reason to try to find work arounds and are more likely to comply, especially if the punishments for being caught finding a work around is high.
And/or you know, put a web filter / monitoring software for free on your devices that the kids have access to.
Android: Google Family Link, and many others if they aren’t trying to use Google products.
Apple has products as well. People just need to pay attention to their kids
Minors are their parents responsibility. If a kid is out at the park at 2am drinking with some kid who had an older sibling they stole or bought alcohol from, “there is more than 1 person at fault”. But the fact that YOUR kid was performing an illegal act and you are reporting it and claiming it is someone else’s fault is ridiculous. Who’s responsible for the boardwalk they accidentally catch on fire when trying to make s’mores by the lake? The parents. It is their job to make sure they aren’t watching porn DVDs if that is not the way they want their kids raised.
If the Internet used a metaphor like a mall, and your kid is caught crawling under stalls or into changing rooms hiding cameras at Victoria Secret, you shouldn’t allow your kid at the mall without supervision. That doesn’t mean the mall is a place minors can’t be, it means the guardians need to have educated the kids to not do such things, or be present to stop them. Kids will get on 18+ sites even if an ID is required. The kids would just make a pact at school to take a picture of every parents ID they could and share them with all their friends.
Poof now every kid has access again and everyone’s ID is being shared. So now is it the sites responsibility to figure out that mess or should the parents who’s identity has been stolen sue the other kids parents who used their ID to create an account. The only way you avoid that is by linking every email, phone number, and identification in one central government controlled and distributed to every company for free database. “For security reasons”.
Or maybe… We just tell guardians to guard their kids from the potential threats they can come across in their lives and prepare them for it. Web filters and programs are everywhere. Put a pamphlet at every school office and local library so parents know how to access them. It isn’t everyone else’s job to raise someone else’s kid, it’s their job.
I said she shouldn’t have been allowed bail and the child should have been moved to her grandmother’s until it was sorted out. But it wasn’t anything about how she looks that mandated my wishes, it was her actions.
So is everyone from 92’ a shit show? Or should we say that is a disgraceful thing to say all people from a tattoo are terrorists?
Can’t see it in the photo, and the video didn’t like to play, guessing you just don’t like her tattoo? I was thinking you were trying to say everyone born in a certain year was damned for some reason lol
While her parents may have been terrible people, it sounds as if it was the grandmother who reported it. Could be the grandmother from the fathers side though.
This most definitely seems like the child should have stayed full time at grandmas and not allowed the mother have bail though.
Not sure what you mean, care to explain? It says her age in the article so you should be able to get within a 365 day guess.
Honestly I was thinking sure why not, he was in for marijuana and Cocaine charges he admitted guilt to and served 5 years for and got out more than 20 years ago. That shouldn’t matter anymore. Then it mentioned 10 felonies before the age of 16… Those charges I think should be evaluated before you are put in charge of imprisoned people. You get a job with others, if they don’t like you it sucks to change jobs but you can choose to leave. Prisoners don’t get that choice, so we should have strict guidelines on their caretakers.