But Trump has not been accused of any criminal wrongdoing, and he and his team have previously derided Epstein as a “creep” whom Trump expelled from his club.

I’ll just leave this here: https://www.cleveland13news.com/story/old-epstein-allegations-resurface-online-amid-trump-and-musk-feud-as-anonymous-woman-claims-direct-i

They’ve never been for small government. This lie needs to be called out every single time.

Thank you. I think there is some slight nuance here but these numbers certainly refute the narrative that the locals wanted to join Russia. Assuming the poll was conducted fairly. I’m not familiar with the agency behind it.

Removed by mod

Source?

Fuck war, and fuck Donald Trump.

Peak America moment. No matter who you are, you should have the right to get paid to violate the civil liberties of your neighbors.

What I meant was, what is the mechanism that supposedly connects facial features to job performance?

Disturbing. What is the proposed mechanism here? Or is it unknown?

What about the other 80%? Are they still pending or how many led to convictions? I’d like to get that down to zero.

Losing a tiny amount of money from the federal budget is irreparable harm. But starvation? Just fine.

This Supreme Court is a joke. I just heard they’ve ruled with the fascists over 90% of the time.

I’m aware, that’s why it was a question.

They do it because they normally get away with it. And countless people have had their lives ruined by this behavior.

I assume you mean JFK, was he talking about this?

But I mean we as in the people of the US. Our leaders have very different incentives than we do.

When are we going to start talking about abolishing the FBI?

I believe you can be both a demsoc and a Marxist, no?

I feel like people need to think more deeply about cancellation and when it is and is not appropriate. Personally, I think it’s basically never appropriate for random powerless individuals to be canceled, no matter what they did. There’s just other, better ways to handle harmful behavior.

Where cancellation is useful is for powerful, influential people who are actively and unapologetically harming people on an ongoing basis and can’t be stopped through other means. I’m not super familiar with Fuentes but it seems like he fits more in this latter category.

I am actually curious if he considers himself a Marxist. Any information on this?

Should disabling these cameras be considered community defense? Discuss.

Because a random premier (who is almost as much of an ignorant buffoon as Trump) ran an ad campaign, he decides to punish an entire country? Well, two countries really but the US was always going to be subject to his punishments.

So fucking stupid.