How is taking the right to fight it in state court away pro state rights?

So you’re just going to completely misread an article and make an ass of yourself and not even own up to it?

I think state rights should mean that a state has the ability the challenge the laws that govern it. This bill specifically has wording to prevent that, it’s the entire reason this article was posted. Please explain to me how stripping a states population of its rights to challenge a bill that governs them is suppose to be for their rights?

It’s only state rights in the senses that it’s eroding them.

Any time I see any of the congressional districts in this county I just get so filled with rage.

I dunno man, that’s the same secret service that let some kid with a trash scope get a shot off that basically won trump the presidency.

I mean we’re making it with MapQuest, if there was ever a time for necromemecy it’s now.

Everyone in the comments talking about him just getting a 2nd pardon, you’re assuming the charges stick.

If he’d had sense and morals he’d have stayed and at least tried to slow them down, instead of just rolling over and letting them pick his replacement.

Because he didn’t have the spine to do it.

Not only that, but they only signed him last year.