It’s definitely an AMD graphics card crash.

Problem is the headline isn’t referring to the agencies or the officers.

They are referring to the illegal actions they are performing as “law enforcement actions”

16 million is only the cost of the damage to the roads. The parade itself is estimated to cost $45 million and that’s assumed to be an underestimate.

Yes. You could use vlc or even as an iso file just open them as a virtual drive.

It’s been disruptive to my enjoyment of trick-taking card games. Any recommendations?

CTRL-tilde or CTRL-backtick?

It actually works, without a bunch of insane weird behavior.

There are, but “long haul routes” are definitely better for a train.

What an incredibly infuriating waste of effort that would be so much better spent on trains, driverless or otherwise.

If their stated goal was the truth and they wanted to follow the law, yes.

As it is, it’s blatant and intentional voter suppression.

There’s a little bit way down in the article.

The mother and son had their routine call on April 3. Lucy Garzón remembers her son complaining of stomach pains and the poor quality of the jail’s food. He asked her to send money to his commissary account. Garzón-Rayo also said he’d received medical care for stomach issues.

“[Brayan] told me: ‘Mother, it was weird. The doctor told the officer something, and he made a strange face, but they didn’t tell me anything,'” she recalled. Garzón-Rayo asked her, “Can we find out if there was a problem?”

Then they eventually called to say he had attempted suicide by hanging himself, and was in the hospital likely to die.

From those descriptions: At the bare minimum it was 100% negligence, possibly the slightly worse covering up negligence, or much worse covering up maltreatment. And I would lean towards the latter if I had to guess.

I apologize for misunderstanding/misquoting. However, I’m not sure why you were even disagreeing with the original comment.

What lawlessness do you feel someone was saying should go unpunished? The only thing they said was that people should not be deported, and I would even read that to mean “without due process” or perhaps “as punishment”.

Did you mean something else by “this type of lawlessness”? I went back and reread several times and I cannot see another interpretation.

“Immigrating illegally -> deport without due process” is the extremist angle. That’s lawlessness that no one should in good conscience support.

I don’t see anyone saying that breaking the law should go unpunished, just that deportation is not an appropriate penalty especially when there are existing more appropriate penalties. That does not seem extreme to me.

I think the problem is the phrasing which seems to absolve the jail of responsibility.

We know it’s a bad situation when the basic elements of the constitution are considered “extreme and radical”

No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

This cunt should no longer be able to walk the streets

FTFY

No, they could and that’s the problem.

Yeah but those extra steps are important ones.

As long as you don’t rely on the UI design matching, it is fine.

I dunno that I’d consider Brave to be “the right thing” but more variety/competition is best!