It’s really not. They handle authentication but then everything is sent to your server.

1. There is a paywall. Going from the headline a racist isn’t necessarily a hawk

2. That article is from 2024… And it’s domestic, again not about foreign war.

3. More domestic stuff

4. More domestic stuff and again from way after 2016

I get the leap you’re trying to make but domestic terror and violence doesn’t necessarily mean pro foreign war.

I mean, he was a known idiot and boot licker, but not a known hawk.

Right, but in the context of 2016 it wasn’t known if he was while Hillary was known.

A lot of companies. Don’t forget that IBM was ahead of the game with Watson and Watsonx. Also, don’t forget that Red Hat is owned by IBM and OpenShift is getting big in the AI space allowing GPUs to be pooled and workloads to be scheduled dynamically.

Sure but they’re in the business of consulting on how to build out that AI platform and the business of providing an AI platform.

Hillary has always been an out of touch, pro war hawk. It’s one of the reasons Trump won in 2016.

I’m not weighing in on your argument. Just that the case you made is made up of useless statistics making it incredibly easy to dismiss.

That’s not how statistics works.

You love to see it. And I hope you’re right. The new DNC chair lacks any cohesive vision for the party, but he does seem to want to open up primaries.

Except paying taxes. He famously would have toilets removed from his multiple homes so he didn’t have to pay the same property taxes on them since they weren’t livable without toilets. All billionaires are scum bags.

You’re delusional if you think you are debating her. No, the intent would be to convince enough people that her beliefs and actions are vile.

Okay, if that’s the intent, then go for it. I guess our disagreement comes from a different intended audience.

It’s not the fascists that you can convince to come to your side though. They’re too far gone to be reasoned with at this point.

What’s your evidence that the cosmetic surgery is effecting her functioning as a human being?

Those procedures modified her though and are a part of her now. You can argue this all you want. I really don’t care. You are the one that will undercut your own arguments with ad hominem attacks that people will easily dismiss. It doesn’t matter how good your other arguments are, if you give someone even one reason to disregard you they will. You only hurt yourself.

Not all. But if you always alienate them, then yes all.

No, those are things she does.

Because it comes from an insecurity she was trying to fix.

Okay, keep using completely unnecessary ad hominem attacks that undercut your message. I’m not going to tell you that you can’t, just that is pointless and the people that you want to reach will be more likely to completely dismiss any valid point you might have otherwise made.