

So if Mozilla wants to monetize location data, what does this mean for all the custom ROMs that use Mozilla’s location provider instead of Google’s?
Nothing, because they dont sell location data, this just seems like a routine warning that pops up when ToS and Privacy policy changes, and since they have clarified their position on this matter, (not to mention the lack of alternative FOSS web engines). We really shouldn’t let this bother us
Of course i might be wrong and it may come out that Mozilla has turned heel(lot of heel turning happening lately)


total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 3354 350 3032 1 171 3004
Swap: 8191 0 8191
on another reboot the memory dropped back down?

Thank you so much it just worked now!!
I added the use flags,
compiled wpa_supplicant again with --newuse,
restarted NM and wpa,
and still the same issue :(
did a killall wpa_supplicant
and now my ssid shows up and i can connect to it :)
its the 3rd day for me, so as I said i don’t want to recompile anything right now
I have 2 cores with 2 threads, compiling anything again is not an option for me, atleast right now: My router only has system logs unfortunately it doesnt show any logging for connection attempts
it works fine with literally, anyother wifi accesspoint, do you have any tips on waht I should do for the relevant logs to show up? I dont have journalctl but would dmesg work fine?
sunk cost fallacy is a thing and i am falling for it
it auto brodcasts at channel 11, i manually changed it to 1-6 rescanning each time
also i dont think the channel or blacklists are the issue because it showed up and connected on live usb broadcasting at channel 11
i also changed the region from global to my region
before I gave up and installed NM i tried it the manual way, (including trouble shooting steps), then i spent some time compiling wireless-tools package and tried with them, same issue, then spent hours compiling NM for some hope(I disabled the relevant background services before trying NM) only for the ssid to not even show up
Thank you Id 197 and 198 reported 5 & 6 respectively(bad sectors decreased from 6 to 5), Is it possible to copy a file non sequentially; say back to front so i can just join those 2 parts together?
A SMART Test showed 6 bad sectors but overall disk assessment was ok(I dont think there is any connection between the file and the HDD), yes that file has not been fixed, the disk in question used to be my main bootdrive a few days ago, I shrunk the partition and created a new EXt4 and i am slowly copying files that are worth keeping, i removed the ODD from my laptop and installed a caddy, intend to use it as a second drive(The file in question has no sentimental value)
I did a scrub and this is what it showed when i ran btrfs scrub status : Duration: 0:17:54 Total to scrub: 63.82GiB Rate: 60.85MiB/s Error summary: read=528 csum=48 Corrected: 570 Uncorrectable: 6 Unverified: 0
I did a BTRFS scrub on the partiton and this is what came up
Duration: 0:17:54 Total to scrub: 63.82GiB Rate: 60.85MiB/s Error summary: read=528 csum=48 Corrected: 570 Uncorrectable: 6 Unverified: 0 I dont know what else to do from here
Thank you I think i might distro hop considering how many problems fedora is giving me, as for the file; it refuses to budge, i have found another such file within the same set, i might just leave it there for future me.
Yes it lives on BTRFS, I tried a few solutions but some gave this Read error Error demuxing input file 0: Input/output error video1.mkv: Input/output error
and other things i tried said that i dont have hevc support(Yay Fedora) I might be wasting more time than necessary on the file.so i might just give up
Same, the only answers i am getting point to the module just being buggy in general.