No it doesn’t make financial sense.

You are locked in to a multi-year contract where you pay for the phone + extra on top of your contract. Those providers aren’t going to make a loss on it.

I mean, even if it isn’t true, better to be sure than to have a train derail and kill a bunch of people.

Probably the same way we did last time.

With a war.

So, he admits he knew about the island?

Even if he said he didn’t go, doesn’t that make him an accomplice at least?

Marketing hacks the human brain.

So unless those Nerds aren’t human, it works on them too.

And I’d say even more, marketing works best on those who think it doesn’t work on them.

You could always just help improve society for money, instead of trying to scrape out free money like some selfish bastard?

And if money is banned, switch to Russian Roulette

I think the technical term is script kiddie

I hate that argument.

It is even more energy efficient to write your code on paper. So we should stop using computers entirely. /s

Start a gambling club that only plays high stakes go-fish games with real money

That is just dumb.

Your skills are weakened even more by copying code from someone else. Because you have the use even less of your brain to complete your task.

Yet you people don’t complain about that part at all and do it yourself all the time. For some it is even the preferred method of work.

“Using your skills less means they get weaker, who would have thought!”

With your logic, you shouldn’t use any form of help to code. Programmers should just lock themselves in a big black box until their project is finished, that will make sure their skills aren’t “weakened” by using outside help.

Great arguments! _/s

Still no reason to not just have both options.

So what if Bluetooth are “better”?

Still no reason to not have both.

People who upgrade every year sell their old one at >50% the price.

So they don’t fork over €600, they only do €250 or so.

Intel can stand to still lose a few pegs.

But after a bunch of beatings even a bully can become the underdog.

No. The internet has so many beginnings that it is impossible to say only one group created it.

The internet, like its design, is a co-operation between many different groups.

It goes back even further than 1777, where the French mechanical telegraph was the first way to send long distance messages. And therefore is considered as one of the beginnings of the of the internet.

Or in 1830 where Brits invented a way to send electronic messages over copper cables.

Or in 1860 where they started laying sea cables to connect landmasses.

It is typical that the US claims to have invented something when it is clearly a collaborative effort.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJU-KYMREbQ

Goes soliciting while sleepwalking

Their need to be more tech savvy is to avoid paying high taxes on electronics, so they have to cobble together working machines from spare parts.

They are good at getting things working, but they are not good at getting them working well.

You should go see a doctor then.

Slava Ukraini! 🇺🇦

No doubt the cult would fracture