• cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    I just read about bitwarden lite for the first time. Why would you choose it over vaultwarden?

    • megaman@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Edit: i missed a key word in the question and so my answer here is not an answer to this question at all.

      Bitwarden will manage it all for you. You dont need to settl up your own server and manage updates and worry about your drive getting corrupted and losing it all.

      Vaultwarden is the selfhostable rewrite of it. If you want to selfhost, for whatever reason (and there are many good ones!), then vaultwarden could be the better option for you.

      • cron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        No, bitwarden lite is self-hosted.

        Bitwarden lite will run on your machine using a Docker container. Lite can be run with any Docker edition or plan, but you must install Docker on your machine before proceeding with installation.

        Source: Bitwarden Lite deployment

        • megaman@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          Ope, my bad, i totally missed that word from your question and the whole context here…

          Sorry about that…